Supplierism is building a free app that turns your values into terms, pools them with other buyers into real leverage, and enforces them once a supplier agrees. It is a movement, not a business, with no owner and no investor profit. See what we're building.
A contingent liability is money a company might have to pay in the future, but only if it does a particular thing. Businesses have to plan for these possible costs, not just the bills they owe today. A penalty in your terms creates one: if the company makes a political donation, it owes you. One customer is easy to ignore, but when millions hold the same term, the total the company could owe is far larger than any donation. So the simplest choice is not to make the donation, and no court is involved.
Each brand carries a Trump-money index from 0 to 100. A high number means the company, its leadership, or its owner put money toward Donald Trump on the record, usually through the 2025 inauguration fund, the new White House ballroom fund, campaign and super PAC donations, or senior executives giving in their own names. A low number means we found documented distance instead, or no record of such giving.
The logic is the whole point of Supplierism. A company's political money is paid out of the same pool of revenue your purchase goes into. So when the company gives, a sliver of what every customer paid helped fund the gift. That is how your money can reach a politician you never voted for, without your name ever appearing anywhere.
A donation is not an endorsement. Large firms often give to court access across administrations, and some framed their inauguration gifts as ordinary civic support. These figures are a snapshot as of October 2026 and will change as new filings appear. We only list brands we can source, so a blank result means we have not researched it yet, not that the company is clean. Foreign companies cannot legally donate to US campaigns, so the Canadian and British names here usually score lower; their ties to Trump tend to run through the PACs of their US subsidiaries, lobbying, policy favours, or doing business with his family.
You were never asked. There is no box at the checkout that says do not spend my money on candidates I oppose. The supplier picks the politician, the supplier picks the cause, and the customer pays the bill in the price.
Supplierism argues that this is a terms problem, not a fact of life. A buyer who sets conditions can refuse to fund what they do not believe in, the same way buyers once forced conflict out of diamonds and sweatshops out of clothing. The money is already yours. The only thing missing is the condition that says where it may go.