Discussion guides, classroom activities, case studies, and assignment templates for elementary, high school, and post-secondary classrooms. Browse by the subject you teach or by the level you teach.
What is the relationship between consumption and citizenship? How are environmental costs externalized from supplier to society? Who does AI actually serve when it sits in a commercial relationship? When does individual choice translate to collective effect? When does it not? The materials on this page use Supplierism as a teaching case to open questions like these in the classroom. The case is the vehicle. The questions are the destination.
Two ways to navigate. If you teach a specific subject, economics, ethics, citizenship, sustainability, AI and society, media literacy, or global studies, start with the subject index. If you teach a specific level, elementary, high school, or post-secondary, jump to the level sections. Most educators will use both.
Everything here is free to use, adapt, copy, and redistribute for any educational purpose. Citation is appreciated but not required, a formal definition and suggested citation appear at the end of the page.
Seven subjects below. For each, you’ll find a description of what the case illuminates, learning outcomes where they apply, and cross-references to the discussion questions, case studies, and activities from the level sections that fit best. The Supplierism framework is the case; the subject is the destination. Materials grow over time, expect more subjects to be added.
A case study in who actually holds bargaining power in market relationships, and what changes when the structurally weaker party, the buyer, can aggregate.
An entry point into externalities, asymmetric information, collective action problems, and the limits of price as a signal. Particularly useful in introductory and intermediate microeconomics, industrial organization, and consumer behavior courses. Also offers concrete examples for behavioral economics units, since the gap between buyer values and buyer behavior is one of the questions the case opens directly.
Students will analyze how power asymmetries shape market outcomes.
Students will distinguish between price-based and non-price competition.
Students will evaluate when individual choice translates to a market signal and when it does not.
Pull from the level sections below.
Most ethics curricula rely on thin examples, trolley problems, abstract dilemmas. This is a thick example: real purchasing decisions, real consequences, scaled across millions of buyers.
An entry point into utilitarian and deontological frameworks, moral complicity, and how individuals share responsibility for systemic outcomes. The case pressure-tests intuitions about distance and responsibility: how far away can a harm be before the buyer is no longer morally implicated?
Students will reason about complicity in distant harms.
Students will distinguish individual from collective moral responsibility.
Students will construct and defend moral arguments about consumption.
Pull from the level sections below.
A case study in whether spending is a form of civic action. If so, what does it require of citizens, and how does it relate to voting?
An entry point into the boundary between civic life and market life, the history of consumer activism (Montgomery Bus Boycott, Delano grape boycott, divestment movements), and the conditions under which collective civic action succeeds or fails. The case also raises questions about democratic legitimacy that civics courses are usually well-positioned to teach.
Students will examine forms of civic participation beyond voting.
Students will analyze historical movements that used buying power as a tool.
Students will evaluate the conditions under which collective consumer action succeeds.
Pull from the level sections below.
Decades of climate awareness have not produced sufficient action. A case study in why, and in one missing mechanism: the absence of buyer-side enforcement on supplier behavior.
An entry point into cost externalization, the failure modes of voluntary corporate commitments, and the difference between disclosure and enforcement. Especially valuable for sustainability courses that have already covered the diagnosis (climate science, environmental economics) but struggle to give students a credible response.
Students will analyze how environmental costs are transferred from suppliers to society.
Students will evaluate voluntary corporate commitments versus enforceable mechanisms.
Students will design proposals that connect individual action to systemic change.
Pull from the level sections below.
Most AI today serves the seller, recommends, optimizes engagement, maximizes revenue. A case study in what changes when AI is instead built to represent the individual buyer in commercial relationships.
An entry point into how technology design choices distribute power, the ethics of AI representing humans in market interactions, and the difference between AI as an efficiency tool and AI as an advocate. The Supplierism tools themselves, the demo, the leverage calculator, the archetype quiz, are working artifacts students can interrogate directly. (No formal learning outcomes here; the subject is moving too quickly for stable standards. The materials provide the structure.)
Pull from the level sections and the live tools.
A case study in reading corporate communications critically, distinguishing substantive disclosures from performative ones, detecting when a sustainability report or a CEO statement is calibrated to be quoted rather than acted on.
An entry point into media literacy that goes beyond social media and news, addressing the genre of corporate communication directly. The case also offers a structural explanation for why these communications take the shape they do: they are written for shareholders and regulators, not for buyers. The “On trust” essay is the central text. (Outcomes left loose; the case study itself provides the structure.)
Pull from the level sections and the case study.
A case study in how individual purchases connect to distant consequences. The Russia case is the clearest example: ordinary consumer spending materially funded a state’s military aggression over more than a decade.
An entry point into globalization, supply chain visibility, the diffusion of responsibility across borders, and the gap between local action and global consequence. Useful in international studies, world issues, geography, and history courses that touch on the relationship between commerce and conflict, or commerce and labor conditions abroad. (Outcomes left loose; the cases are the structure.)
Pull from the level sections and the case studies.
If you’d rather start from your level than your subject, the three level sections below contain the full materials calibrated to each classroom, discussion guides, activities, suggested case studies, and assignment templates. Each level’s materials are referenced by the subject sections above; this is where they live in full.
Set the Terms. A free in-class game that works from elementary through post-secondary. Students pick a company they know, and the tool drafts the buyer-side terms its customers might set. Use it to open a discussion: which terms would you keep, which would you cut, and what would have to change at the company to meet them. Older students can compare the draft against the company’s real record.
The goal at this level is to introduce a simple chain that children can carry with them: what we buy reflects what we value, and what we buy together helps decide what gets made. Concrete examples, hands-on activities, no jargon.
Designed to draw out kids’ intuitions about fairness and value, using language and examples from their own world.
Three hands-on activities, each runnable in a single class period. Pick one or run them as a sequence.
Activity 1 · Where does it come from? (30-45 min)
Pick a common product the class is familiar with, a snack, a toy, a game, an app. Together, trace it backwards: Who sold it? Where did they get it? Where was it made? What is it made of? How many people did our money touch on its way to making this thing?
Discuss as a class: What surprised you? Does knowing change how you feel about buying it?
Activity 2 · Our class wishlist (45 min)
Brainstorm together: what are five things companies should do better when making the products kids use? Examples might include: make things that last longer, be honest about what’s in food, be kind to the people who make their products, don’t try to trick us with ads.
Vote on the top one. Write it up as a class statement or design a poster about it. (Optional follow-up: send it to a real company.)
Activity 3 · Be the company (45-60 min)
Split into small groups, paired up. In each pair, one group is “the company” that makes a popular kids’ product, and the other group is “the customers” (the kids who buy it).
The customer group comes up with three things they want the company to change. The company group decides whether and how to respond. Each pair shares the conversation with the class.
Designed for about 20 minutes of student work in or outside class.
My product wishlist.
Draw a product you love, a toy, a snack, a game, an app, anything you regularly use. Below the drawing, write three sentences that finish this prompt: “I wish the company that makes this would…”
Be ready to share with the class.
The goal at this level is to surface a question students rarely encounter: what are you saying yes to when you buy something? Best fit for civics, social studies, business, environmental studies, ethics, and current events.
Open-ended, no wrong answers. Designed to provoke disagreement and self-examination, not to teach a doctrine.
Each links to a Supplierism essay. Short enough to read in class or assign as homework.
Designed to take 30-45 minutes of student work outside of class.
Write five buyer-side terms for a brand you use regularly.
Pick a brand whose products you buy at least once a month. Write five short terms (one to three sentences each) that describe how you want them to behave as a supplier to you. The terms can cover anything you care about, quality, environment, labor, data, honesty, anything.
For each term, write two to three sentences explaining why you chose it and what would have to change at the company for the term to be met.
Length: 400-600 words. Bring to class for small-group sharing.
From undergraduate through MBA. Students engage Supplierism as both a contested intellectual claim and a strategic shift in the operating environment. Best fit for political economy, business ethics, sociology of consumption, strategy, marketing, supply chain management, public policy, environmental studies, and consumer behavior courses.
Organized into two arcs, Foundations and critique (philosophical and critical questions, well-suited for undergraduate seminars), then Strategy and application (strategic and operating questions, well-suited for graduate and MBA work). Use both arcs together or pick the set that suits your course.
Pick two or three. The Russia case is the strongest illustration of stakes; the Trust piece is the strongest illustration of the framework’s philosophy.
Best for undergraduate work. A research and analysis exercise, midterm essay or term paper’s analytical component.
Conduct a buyer-side analysis of a chosen supplier.
Select a publicly traded supplier in a consumer-facing industry. Develop a set of eight to twelve buyer-side terms organized across at least four domains (for example: labor, environment, data, governance, product safety, political activity, supply chain). For each term, provide:
(a) The specific behavior the term would require; (b) evidence that the behavior is not currently the supplier’s practice; (c) the cost to the supplier of complying; (d) the cost to the buyer of enforcing the term; (e) the second-order effects on competitors, smaller suppliers, and adjacent industries.
Conclude with a recommendation about which two or three terms would be most strategically pursued first, and why.
Length: 2,000-2,500 words plus citations.
Best for graduate and MBA work. A strategic analysis exercise, take-home final or multi-week capstone project. May be completed in teams of two to three.
Buyer-side risk assessment of a Fortune 500 company.
Select a publicly traded consumer-facing company with at least $5 billion in annual revenue. Develop a buyer-side risk profile that addresses:
(a) Identification of the buyer archetypes most likely to be activated by this company’s practices, and an estimate of their combined annual spending exposure to the company; (b) the five most consequential buyer-side terms a coordinated buyer block could realistically demand; (c) the company’s current ability to comply with each term; (d) the strategic options available to the company, embrace, accommodate, resist, restructure, with the trade-offs of each path; (e) the second-order effects on competitors, suppliers, and the broader industry.
Conclude with a strategic recommendation to the company’s CEO. Defend the recommendation against at least one credible alternative.
Length: eight to ten pages plus exhibits.
A short, deliberately balanced set of outside resources, useful from high school through post-secondary and for general adult education. It includes the strongest skeptical voices on purpose: a reading list that only argues one side is advocacy, not teaching. Everything links to a source or is given as a full citation. Books and seminal articles age well; films and articles can move or go behind paywalls, so check before assigning.
Good for general audiences and high school. Vivid, concrete, and easy to pair with the discussion guides above.
Post-secondary and instructor background. The frameworks the whole argument rests on.
Books that frame the surrounding argument. The first two are the corporate-side mirror of Supplierism: that the full cost of doing business belongs on the books. The last two reach back to the history and the origins of the system.
Post-secondary and instructor background. The academic field that studies exactly this behavior.
The skeptical case, stated at its strongest. Hand this to students and ask them to defend Supplierism against it.
Groups working on ethical business and corporate accountability, several with databases students can search. A caution worth teaching: rating systems use different methods and criteria, so treat any single score as a starting point, not a verdict.
For instructors who want a formal definition or a citation for syllabi and reading lists. Copy freely.
Supplierism is a framework for buyer-side procurement, in which ordinary buyers, individuals, families, and small businesses, assert procurement-grade terms in their relationships with suppliers. The framework holds that buyers, as the source of supplier revenue, possess underutilized leverage to set the terms of supplier behavior, and that this leverage can be aggregated through technology to produce institutional-scale effects from individual decisions.
A. Buyer. (2026). Supplierism: A framework for buyer-side procurement. Retrieved from https://supplierism.com
The Explore page contains the full argument, case studies, and the toolset being built. The demo shows what buyer-side terms look like in practice. The archetype quiz demonstrates segmentation of buyer values into nine identifiable worldviews.
Have feedback on these materials?
What works, what doesn’t, and what to add next.
Get in touch